Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Article On Coeburn

  1. #11
    Inactive Member 1inStripes's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 25th, 2002
    Posts
    12,052
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Article On Coeburn

    Castlewood is building a solid program. TW just can't get over the postseason hump, but actually has a good program going. I think Clay is bring SP back up to par, and TS is on the rise. RC has some good young talent, as well, but I don't know if they are going to work at baseball enough to do anything with. Maybe the new field and other improvement they are trying to make will help their program out alot. Ervinton, well, I don't know what they are bringing to the plate in the coming years.
    "Call me crazy, but I want to buy the Dallas Cowboys end zone and have the star right at the foot of my bed. That way when I score, I can spike the ball right on the star!" -Woody Paige, Around the Horn 10.9.08

  2. #12
    Inactive Member imported_VHSLhelper's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 16th, 2005
    Posts
    883
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Article On Coeburn

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Indian_Dad</div><div class="ubbcode-body">BY TIM HAYES

    After being a Lonesome Pine District school for nearly 50 years (47 years was the count according to research done by boys' basketball coach Jeff Adkins), Coeburn will begin its initial season as a member of the Cumberland District in the 2007-08 school year. </div></div>

    Whoops

    District 8 became the LPD in 1960, so they would have been a member for 47 years.

  3. #13
    Inactive Member royalflush's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 29th, 2007
    Posts
    229
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Article On Coeburn

    Ain't that what it says? 47 years according to Adkins?

  4. #14
    Inactive Member imported_VHSLhelper's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 16th, 2005
    Posts
    883
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Article On Coeburn

    My eyes musta been playin' tricks on me! I thought it said 48.
    Anyway, it would've looked more impessive if he'd said something like "After being in the same District with schools in Wise, Norton, Big Stone & Appy for over 80 years, ..."

    Oh well, guess I can put that somewhere.

  5. #15
    Inactive Member Slobber Knocker's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 27th, 2007
    Posts
    807
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Article On Coeburn

    Soooooooo, basically Coeburn moved to the other district to be more competitive (and according to newspapers money does not have anything to do with this) but sounds like and by reading this forum the only sport Coeburn is not competitive in is football.
    I guess that is the difference between the LPD and "other" districts when it comes to football. We play to win State Championships while other schools play to win their district.

  6. #16
    Guest 's Avatar

    Re: Article On Coeburn

    It's been the better part of a decade since a current LPD team has won a title in football.

  7. #17
    Inactive Member TheBeast's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 24th, 2004
    Posts
    4,351
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Article On Coeburn

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Slobber Knocker</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Soooooooo, basically Coeburn moved to the other district to be more competitive (and according to newspapers money does not have anything to do with this) but sounds like and by reading this forum the only sport Coeburn is not competitive in is football.
    </div></div>

    How could money have anything to do with it. As I said earier itn will actually cost us money with this move their won't be near the gate receipts as their was in the LPD the schools in the CD don't travel as well as the ones in the LPD. This was a brainfart move all the way around.
    [COLOR="Lime"][SIZE="6"][FONT="Century Gothic"]CREAG AN TUIRC[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR]
    [img]http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a183/mm38nut/thkfc.gif[/img]

  8. #18
    Inactive Member imported_Counts's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 17th, 2002
    Posts
    3,370
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Article On Coeburn

    Acording to the paper they were keeping there LPD Big gate games (PV being the exception) I think that Money wise they will be OK since they will probably get more home town support if they are playing for a district championship in November rather than to stay out of the celler.

    In basketball I THINK Castlewood and TS will fillup a gym better than anyone in the LPD

    I THINK Coeburn will make a good showing for themselfs in most sports this season

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •